How Guyana’s offshore oil projects move from start-up to decline

Must Read

OilNOW
OilNOW
OilNOW is an online-based Information and Resource Centre

ExxonMobil Guyana currently has four oil projects producing offshore. They are not the end of the story. More developments are being advanced, while exploration and appraisal is pursued in contemplation of others. 

Every offshore oil project follows a broad production cycle. The first stage is development and start-up. After a discovery is sanctioned, years are spent drilling wells, installing subsea infrastructure, and commissioning a floating production vessel. Once first oil is achieved, production begins at relatively low levels.

That early period after production starts is known as the ramp-up phase. Output increases gradually as additional wells are brought online and the operator tests the infrastructure. Operators do not push immediately to maximum capacity. They must observe reservoirs, monitor pressure, and ensure the equipment is stable. The objective is to ensure long-term oil recovery is efficient and safe.

Once many planned wells are producing, the project typically reaches a plateau. This is the phase of maximum and relatively stable output.

Plateau can last several years, depending on reservoir quality, well performance, pressure, and the ongoing management of the field. This is when projects generate the bulk of their revenues and when government receipts tend to be most predictable.

Over time, decline sets in. Reservoir pressure falls, water production increases, and individual wells produce less oil. Operators respond with various measures to keep production optimal. These efforts can slow the decline and sometimes create temporary increases in output, but they do not change the underlying reality of depletion.

Liza 1 went through these states. From ramping up to levels as high as 160,000 barrels per day (b/d) of oil production, to plateauing, then beginning its apparent decline, Liza 1 is now producing closer to 130,000 b/d.  

This ramp-up, plateau, and decline framework is a general outline. Real-world production is influenced by many project-specific factors. Unplanned maintenance, potential equipment failures, weather events, and regulatory requirements can all interrupt production temporarily. Operators may shut in wells, pause output, or adjust production strategies for reasons unique to a particular project.

Even after a project reaches its initial design capacity, operators may decide to debottleneck infrastructure in a way that optimizes production and generates more value than they initially planned for. 

As a result, while production is often illustrated with a smooth curve rising to a flat plateau and then falling gradually, actual production graphs are far more complex. They show fluctuations, layered over the long-term trend.

This is why a single production rate at any given moment cannot be used to make a linear prediction of when a project will run out. Offshore oil production is dynamic. Meaningful analysis requires understanding where a project sits in its lifecycle, what interventions are underway, and how future developments may interact with existing ones.

- ADVERTISEMENT -
ADVERTISEMENT

Partnered Events

Latest News

US$100 per barrel scenario would ‘remove any remaining hesitation’ and speed up Guyana project sequencing – Rystad Energy says

Artem Abramov, Head of Oil and Gas Research at Rystad Energy, said a US$100-per-barrel oil environment would make companies...

More Articles Like This