Trinidad & Tobago’s ‘imposition of 12.5% royalty’ could backfire – GlobalData

Must Read

Oil workers flee as third storm in month aims for U.S. offshore fields

(Reuters) - Royal Dutch Shell halted some oil production and began evacuating workers from a U.S. Gulf...

U.S, Guyana Working Group on energy and investments to be formed

Following the signing of a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between U.S Secretary of State, Michael Pompeo and...

“We don’t apply political pressure connected to our commercial enterprises” – US Secretary of State

U.S. Secretary of State, Michael R. Pompeo says that the United States does not exert political pressure on countries...
OilNOW
OilNow is an online-based Information and Resource Centre which serves to complement the work of all stakeholders in the oil and gas sector in Guyana.

Trinidad and Tobago is looking to attract exploration investment with a new offshore bid round. However, the introduction of a royalty imposed on investors may be counter-productive for the government in the longer term, according to GlobalData, a leading data and analytics company.

Toya Latham, Oil and Gas Analyst for GlobalData commented, “The imposition of a 12.5% royalty, which was not previously applicable to the Production Sharing Agreement (PSA) regime, may reduce interest in the round due to the possible fiscal burden increase. Alternatively, interested parties may seek to offer relatively lower profit oil sharing bids for future contracts to offset these higher royalty payments, which could end up yielding less overall revenue for the government.”

Assuming similar values to the biddable profit oil split as was agreed for earlier contracts, the increased royalty rates would make the regime significantly less attractive and could therefore limit take-up on new exploration opportunities, the GlobalData report said.

On the other hand, if investors bid relatively lower profit oil shares for the state, then the state may actually receive a reduced share of profits from potential developments under the new model contract. This is because higher profit oil shares to the state would generate higher revenues from potential developments whilst a constant royalty payment would not.

Additionally, if prices rise or costs are low, the imposition of a constant royalty over a higher progressive profit sharing yields less revenue for the government.

“Although the overall effect may depend on the level of bids that the government accepts, the imposition of a higher royalty in the PSA regime carries risks to both the regime’s attractiveness to investors and the state’s share of future production,” Latham added.

Source: GlobalData

- Advertisement -

Latest News

Oil workers flee as third storm in month aims for U.S. offshore fields

(Reuters) - Royal Dutch Shell halted some oil production and began evacuating workers from a U.S. Gulf...

U.S, Guyana Working Group on energy and investments to be formed

Following the signing of a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between U.S Secretary of State, Michael Pompeo and Guyana’s President, Dr. Mohamed Irfaan...

“We don’t apply political pressure connected to our commercial enterprises” – US Secretary of State

U.S. Secretary of State, Michael R. Pompeo says that the United States does not exert political pressure on countries to further the interest of...

Pompeo visit affirms Guyana’s importance to the US – Kevin Ramnarine

Former Minister of Energy and Energy Affairs of Trinidad and Tobago Kevin Ramnarine believes United States Secretary of State Michael Pompeo’s visit...

We did not discuss Exxon; Guyana President says of meetings with Secretary Pompeo

During his meeting with U.S. Secretary of State, Michael R. Pompeo, Guyana’s President, Dr. Mohamed Irfaan Ali, said that he did not engage in...

More Articles Like This